P1 Programme  candidates whose applications could fall with equal validity under either Poverty & disadvantage or Community Involvement wrestle with this choice, highlighting: (i) their belief that some applications to one programme stand a better chance than another (ii) their frustration at having to categorise their project according to NLCB's own systems and procedures  applicants within our sample claimed that an application rejected for one programme might be approved for the other  for some applicants, this and C4 can be the last parts of the form to be completed Home contact  contact at home resented even more strongly than for Awards for All - all contact seen with NLCB as crucial to bid's chances and being contacted at home, potentially on the hoof, thought to be unfair
{}