t-test in VWFA Exp. 1: activation patterns are similar, not significantly different  they are similar tasks and recruit the VWFA in a similar way.
{"Image DocumentName": "t-test in VWFAExp. 1: activation patterns are similar, not significantly different \uf0f0 they are similar tasks and recruit the VWFA in a similar way.", "Image ImageDescription": "Exp. 2: activation patterns are very (and significantly) different \uf0f0reading aloud recruits the VWFA a lot more than naming. Exp. 1: reading script (blue) is compared to Reading finger spelling (sign) (green) = both tasks are essentially the same, they are reading a word (but use different modalities) or. Exp. 2: when picture naming (green) is compared to reading aloud (blue) those exact object labels (eg, naming the picture of a tiger versus reading the word tiger ) = reading causes significantly stronger activation in the VWFA and thus requires it differently than naming- they are different tasks and the VWFA is more strongly involved in reading (specialised?) Exp. 1 Exp. 2.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}