NSTEMI: invasiv vs.selektiv NSTEMI: invasiv vs.
{"Image DocumentName": "NSTEMI: invasiv vs. selektiv Bavry, JACC 2006", "Image ImageDescription": "Letalit\u00e4t nach im Mittel 2 Jahren. Risikoreduktion 25%, p = 0,001. Figure 1. Relative risk of all-cause mortality for early invasive therapy. compared with conservative therapy at a mean follow-up of 2 years. The. results show a long-term survival benefit from early invasive therapy. CI. confidence interval; FRISC-II Fragmin and Fast Revascularization. During Instability in Coronary Disease; ICTUS Invasive Versus. Conservative Treatment in Unstable Coronary Syndromes Investigators; ISAR-COOL Intracoronary Stenting With Antithrombotic Regimen. Cooling Off; RITA-3 Randomized Intervention Trial of Unstable. Angina; RR relative risk; TIMI-18 Thrombolysis In Myocardial. Infarction-18; TRUCS Treatment of Refractory Unstable Angina in. Geographically Isolated Areas Without Cardiac Surgery; VINO Value. of First Day Coronary Angiography/Angioplasty in Evolving Non\u2013STSegment. Elevation Myocardial Infarction. NNT = 62.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}