 In 1988, the Third Circuit had occasion to interpret FAPE and apply the Rowley standard.
{"Image DocumentName": "Third circuit: the polk decision", "Image ImageDescription": "In 1988, the Third Circuit had occasion to interpret FAPE and apply the Rowley standard. The Rowley Court described the level of benefit conferred by the Act as meaningful. Rowley was an avowedly narrow opinion that relied significantly on the fact that Amy Rowley progressed successfully from grade to grade in a mainstreamed classroom. The Court self-consciously limited its opinion to the facts before it. We hold that the EHA calls for more than a trivial educational benefit. That holding rests on the Act and its legislative history as well as interpretation of Rowley.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}