I think the UMRA is a positive act because it does not require the states or municipalities to use huge sums of their money for something they may not even want. In my opinion, the UMRA is not even a huge financial burden on the federal government. They only have to pay the overrun of spending by the state in complying with the mandate. Congress also has time to review the state, local, or private sectors budgets to see if they can afford to have the mandate imposed. It was one of the select few good decisions Clinton made during his presidency...
{"Image Tag 0x5110": "1", "Image Tag 0x5111": "0", "Image Tag 0x5112": "0"}