Rights in personam Meagher JA gives a strong dissent
{"Image DocumentName": "Rights in personam Meagher JA gives a strong dissent", "Image ImageDescription": "Meagher JA, at 52, argued that, if the loan to Mr Gosper had proceeded simply by means of discharging the existing mortgage over Mrs Gosper\u2019s land and was replaced by a new, albeit forged, mortgage to Mercantile Mutual in an amount to cover the original loan and the loan to Mr Gosper, Mercantile Mutual would have obtained, pursuant to Frazer v Walker, an indefeasible title. His Honour ruled that the same result should follow where, in effect, the same situation eventuates by variation of the existing mortgage. (c) Cameron Stewart 2009.", "Image XResolution": "37", "Image YResolution": "37", "Image ResolutionUnit": "Pixels/Centimeter", "Image Software": "SlidePlayer", "Image YCbCrPositioning": "Centered"}