Well make sure you mention these 'unsolicited emails' at the hearing and talk about how much sense they don't make as you move forward with a report that's obviously false and an egregious misrepresentation of the meeting we had and the prior information I shared with you which you were so quick to discount.

I don't know if you've analyzed your own report but there are many different points where you specifically discuss me asking relevant questions and you make it very clear that I am obviously competent but you then go on to say that the reason I'm 'incompetent' is because of your own personal opinions of the evidence I have.

You use words like 'meandering' to describe very clear and relevant information I provided you with in regards to the police report I filed 9 days before the incident for example.

You never make any mention at all about the fact that there were other events involved leading up to the incident at my apartment such as when you asked me "when did you first think your safety was at risk?" to which I replied and told you about my discovery of the fraud taking place at the internet archive on December 24th.

If I didn't know any better I'd say you are intentionally misrepresenting the facts as opposed to just not understanding what I believe is very clear and coherent information I provided you with.

I sent you emails before our meeting and you reply and tell me that isn't the appropriate forum and so I oblige only to have you completely twist up and misrepresent pretty much everything we discussed. I see what you did there...

I will respect your wishes and not send you any more emails.

Thanks for your time and sorry for bothering you.


~Matt Guertin






Sent from ProtonMail mobile



-------- Original Message --------
On May 1, 2023, 4:06 PM, Rogstad, Jill < Jill.Rogstad@courts.state.mn.us> wrote:

CAUTION

Good afternoon, Mr. Guertin:

 

I have received a number of email messages from you within the past week. I am responding to direct you to please stop sending me messages. I will not respond to any further communication. As was explained at the time of the interview, my role within the proceedings is very limited. It is to provide an opinion to the Court, not show any documents or materials to any of the other parties. I would refer you to your attorney to determine how best to handle the materials you sent. Your attorney is also the appropriate person to communicate with the Court and myself about these matters in advance of the upcoming hearing.

 

Best regards,

 

Jill E. Rogstad, Ph.D., LP, ABPP (Forensic)

Senior Clinical Forensic Psychologist

Board Certified in Forensic Psychology, American Board of Professional Psychology

(she/her/hers)

Fourth Judicial District and Regional Psychological Services

Phone: (612) 394-0937

 

Should you receive correspondence from me after business hours or while you are out of the office, please protect your time and wait to respond until you are next working. Please note I do not regularly check emails on evenings, weekends, or holidays.

 

From: Matt Guertin <MattGuertin@protonmail.com>
Sent: Monday, May 1, 2023 3:45 PM
To: Rogstad, Jill <Jill.Rogstad@courts.state.mn.us>
Cc: Bruce Rivers <riverslawyers@aol.com>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Show this to the judge and prosecutor please

 

Good afternoon Jill,

Hope you are doing fantastic!

I've discovered some pretty damning evidence that presents a rather large problem insofar as the report you wrote about me which claims I'm psychotic and delusional.

It's a rather large 'conspiracy' if you logically connect all of the dots of how this would be allowed to take place and how many different multi-national corporations are involved and allowing Microsoft to run rampant with their new AI toys.

I would like for you to do me a favor Jill. Go back and read the email between me and the CEO of Mark Robert's Motion Control I sent you and take notice of the fact that there was a three week span before Assaff Rawner actually ended up replying to my email - the one in which he pointed me to PhotoRobot and said "hey... your invention already exists!" (paraphrasing)

And now realize that what he pointed me to is all complete fraud....as in the entire company is an AI generated fabrication. The videos, their websites, the other websites (the ones I wrote on my wall....), etc. IT'S ALL FAKE

which means I'm not delusional or psychotic Jill. Sorry.

All of the images from their websites are also AI generated.

And for the record I still believe that my safety is at risk due to how many different parties are involved in this and I would like for it to be known that I'm doing perfectly well and happy with life (besides having to deal with this shit...) and I have never contemplated suicide and wouldn't do that. This is obviously all very crazy (dare I say perhaps bordering on "psychotic like crazy"...?) and I think it's not unreasonable why I would be worried about my safety.

I look forward to my competency hearing.

Also let it be known that I intend on attending my hearing IN PERSON and not over Zoom... which I think should be fully understandable considering the circumstances.

That is all. What will follow is further emails which contain proof of my claims.

Thanks again for your services Jill.

Sincerely,

Matthew Guertin



Sent from ProtonMail mobile



CAUTION: This email originated from outside the Minnesota Judicial Branch. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. If this email appears suspicious, or is asking you to provide sensitive information, please do not forward the email; submit the email via the ‘Report Message’ button on your Outlook ribbon on your computer or contact the ITD Service Desk for further guidance.